Selected systemsCase 02 / 04

Level AI · 2025 - Present

Latitude / Core AI

Own product strategy, productization, evaluation and quality systems, and infrastructure economics for the intelligence layer beneath Level AI.

Proof 01
7
CX-specific model capabilities
Proof 02
7M+
audio hours processed monthly
Proof 03
71% -> 95%
brand-name accuracy
Proof 04
5 figures
annual infrastructure savings

Product point of view

Production AI is a portfolio problem, not a single-model problem. Each job needs its own quality bar, latency budget, cost envelope, failure modes, and governance.

01 / Context

Read the system before shaping the product.

Problem brief01A

The problem worth solving.

Contact-center data is noisy, sensitive, and operationally demanding. General-purpose models can appear strong in a demo but struggle with real accents, compliance requirements, task-specific quality, evidence, latency, and cost at enterprise volume.

02 / Decisions

The decisions that shaped the product.

A decision register connecting product direction to the evidence and constraints behind it.

D01Decision

Set the product strategy across transcription, redaction, intent detection, summarization, inferred CSAT, automated QA, and Voice of Customer classification.

D02Decision

Translated model performance into product decisions by defining evaluation sets, quality thresholds, release criteria, and customer-facing evidence.

D03Decision

Managed the accuracy, latency, privacy, and unit-economics tradeoffs between proprietary models, smaller task-specific models, and external providers.

D04Decision

Partnered with the CEO, CTO, ML engineering, application engineering, design, sales, and marketing to turn model capability into a coherent platform story.

Tradeoffs held in view

The tension stayed visible. The choice made it actionable.

Tension 01

General-purpose model flexibility vs. task-specific quality

Choice

Managed the capability as a portfolio, selecting proprietary, task-specific, or external models against the job's quality bar and operating envelope.

Tension 02

Accuracy gains vs. latency, cost, privacy, and explainability

Choice

Made release decisions through explicit evaluation criteria and production constraints instead of a single benchmark score.

03 / System

Sanitized model release loop

A reconstruction of how model choice, evaluation, production constraints, and rollout combined into a product release decision.

Sanitized reconstruction

InputValue
01Layer 1

Private compute

02Layer 2

Task-specific models

03Layer 3

Evaluation and calibration

04Layer 4

Governed intelligence

05Output

Enterprise applications

04 / Outcomes

What changed.

  1. 01Productized a speech model that improved brand-name accuracy from 71% to 95%.
  2. 02Reduced third-party inference dependence and delivered five-figure annual infrastructure savings.
  3. 03Led a redaction-model upgrade and rollout across the customer base.
  4. 04Established a model-to-application narrative spanning private compute, governed intelligence, and enterprise workflows.

Next system / 03

Voice of Customer 2.0